Blog - Tag: Measured Risk Insurance
Electric Tools Pose Dangers, Train Staff in Proper Usage
Each year, hundreds of construction workers suffer shock when handling electrical tools and equipment.
One of the big problems in understanding the dangers of electrical shock is the mistaken belief that only high voltages kill. It’s not the voltage that’s lethal, but the amount of current that passes through the body. The condition and placement of the body has a lot to do with the chance of getting a shock.
It’s important that employers train their workers about the basic facts regarding the causes of electrical shock when using these tools.
Water and electricity
Damp areas and metal objects can offer good shortcuts for electricity to reach the ground. If a worker’s hands are sweaty, if socks and shoes are moist or damp, if the floor is wet or they are standing in a puddle of water, the moisture may allow more current to pass through the body.
If work is to be done with metal objects or in damp areas, workers should recognize the hazards and take necessary precautions. These include:
- Rubber gloves and boots,
- Rubber mats,
- Insulated tools, and
- Rubber sheets that can be used to cover exposed metal.
Also, during times of rain, extra caution should be taken when working with electrical equipment or working near grounded objects.
Other precautions
It’s not just the presence of water that can cause a worker to be electrocuted. Electricity is always a danger, and workers should take all precautions necessary to avoid injury or death.
It’s important that you teach them the following:
- Treat every electric wire as if it were a live one.
- Inspect equipment and extension cords before each use.
- Take faulty equipment or plugs with bent or missing prongs out of service for repair.
- Only qualified electricians should repair electrical equipment or work on energized lines.
- If a plug doesn’t have three prongs or if the receptacle doesn’t have three openings, make sure the tool is grounded in some other way before use.
- Never try to bypass an electrical system by cutting off the third prong of a plug.
- Turn off the power and report the smell of hot or burning plastic, smoke or sparks, or the presence of flickering lights.
- Stop using a tool or appliance if a slight shock or tingling is felt.
- Never disconnect an electrical plug by pulling on the cord.
- Whenever working on an electric circuit, the circuit should be turned off and locked out at the circuit breaker or fuse box to ensure that it cannot be accidentally turned on.
- Those who regularly work on or around energized electrical equipment should be trained in emergency response and CPR.
The takeaway
The use of electrical tools requires additional precautions on the part of your workers. It’s important that you train them in proper usage and how to spot potential dangers of electrocution.
EEOC Issues Updated Workplace Harassment Guidance
For the first time in 25 years, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has issued updated workplace harassment guidance for employers, increasing possible exposure to employee-initiated lawsuits.
The new guidance expands employee protections to include harassment based on sexual orientation and gender identity, as well as taking into account that harassment can be perpetrated virtually via text messaging, e-mails and other online or app-based mediums.
These are federal guidelines, meaning that they open a new avenue for potential employment practices liability exposure. Employers should understand this new guidance to ensure they don’t run afoul of the law and risk being sued by a worker.
Sex-based harassment
The new guidance expands the definition of sex-based harassment to include harassment related to breastfeeding, morning sickness, contraception and the decision to obtain — or not obtain — an abortion.
It also expands protections to include harassment based on sexual orientation and gender identity. An example of the latter would be an employer intentionally and repeatedly using a name or pronoun that is inconsistent with the worker’s gender identity, or denying access to bathrooms that are consistent with their identity.
Virtual harassment
The guidance notes that harassment does not have to be perpetrated in person to be illegal.
It states that harassment can also occur in the “virtual work environment,” such as through the company e-mail system, electronic bulletin boards, instant message systems, videoconferencing technology, intranet or official social media accounts.
The EEOC stated that while off-duty offensive social media posts sent on work systems generally don’t constitute harassment, they may if they impact the workplace, such as if the postings are directed at a particular employee or employer and are referenced at work.
The agency also stated that even if offensive material is sent while off-duty on non-work systems, like using personal phones or tablets to text harassing messages or making derogatory posts on their own social media accounts, it could be considered illegal.
The takeaway
The EEOC has designated workplace harassment as an enforcement priority.
Employers should update their anti-harassment policies and procedures in their employee handbooks to reflect the changes to EEOC guidance. Managers and supervisors should be trained in the new guidance as well.
The EEOC recommends that anti-harassment policies, at a minimum:
- Define what conduct is prohibited, and be widely disseminated;
- Be comprehensible to workers, including those whom the employer has reason to believe might have barriers to comprehension, such as limited literacy skills or proficiency in English;
- Require that supervisors report harassment when they are aware of it;
- Offer multiple ways to report harassment;
- Identify points of contact to whom reports of harassment should be made, including contact information; and
- Explain the employer’s complaint process, including the anti-retaliation and confidentiality protections.
OSHA Updates HazCom Standard
Changes are once again coming to Fed-OSHA’s Hazardous Communications Standard, which governs the handling of chemicals and other dangerous substances.
OSHA’s final rule, which takes effect July 19, 2024, will bring the standard in line with the latest update to the United Nations’ Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals.
The update revises criteria for the classification of certain health and physical hazards, as well as updating labeling requirements and safety data sheets (SDSs), among other changes.
OSHA said it had updated the HazCom standard “to better protect workers by improving the amount and quality of information on labels and safety data sheets and allow workers and first responders to react more quickly in an emergency.”
Affected firms will have to update any alternative workplace labeling as well as their HazCom program, and provide any additional employee training for newly identified physical, health or other hazards.
Compliance deadlines are staggered:
First: Chemical manufacturers, importers or distributors evaluating substances will have to comply by Jan. 19, 2026, while those that evaluate mixtures will have to comply by July 19, 2027.
Second: Other employers will have to comply six months after those dates: July 19, 2026 for those that handle, store or use substances, and Jan. 19, 2028 for mixtures.
It’s important for employers to stay up to date on the HazCom standard to protect their workers. Labels and SDSs are often the first indication to a worker that they are handling a hazardous chemical, so it is imperative that they be as accurate and complete as possible.
What the rule does
The new rule ensures that OSHA’s HazCom standard jibes with the Global Harmonized System, which is used in most developed and many developing countries around the world. It provides consistent definitions of hazards, specific criteria for labels, and a specific format for safety SDSs.
It should be noted that the new classification criteria only affect SDSs and labels for certain products (aerosols, desensitized explosives and flammable gases). If your firm handles any of these you will have to ensure that your labels and SDSs for select hazardous chemicals are updated accordingly.
Some of the highlights of the rule:
Labeling — It updates labeling requirements for certain very small containers and bulk containers to ensure the labels are comprehensive and readable.
Manufacturers must also only provide the updated label for each individual container with each shipment once the product reaches its customer. Warehousing employees will not be required to open sealed pallets and boxes of containers to relabel them or repackage the product in preprinted bags.
Flammable gas addition — The flammable gas hazard class gets a new hazard class (desensitized explosives), as well as new hazard categories:
- Unstable gases in the Flammable Gases class
- Pyrophoric gases in the Flammable Gases class, and
- Nonflammable aerosols in the Aerosols class.
New and revised definitions — There are a number of definitions that are being revised or which are new altogether.
Employer takeaway
HazCom citations are one of the most common citations that OSHA issues. If your operations handle chemicals, you should take the opportunity now to review your HazCom programs and plan for compliance by the deadline that affects your company.
Light Duty Can Reduce Workers’ Comp Claims Costs
After an employee is injured on the job, recuperation times can vary, but every day they are away from work, the claim cost increases and your productivity suffers.
By implementing a program that offers a good incentive to return, you can reduce the risk of paying more benefits than necessary.
Recent research shows that employers lose about 80 million workdays annually due to workplace injuries or illnesses. The number of employees who remain away from work for more than seven days because of injuries or illnesses stretches into the millions.
This means that employers are left to deal with the high cost of workers’ compensation premiums, lost productivity and disability benefits. But, by creating a special incentive program, you can greatly reduce these costs.
Light duties
When an injured worker is off work and healing, a physician will regularly examine them. These exams will in part determine whether the worker is ready to return to their previous tasks.
In some cases, it may be possible to get the individual back to work sooner with light duties.
For example, consider a worker who is injured while lifting boxes in a warehouse. The attending physician will be examining the employee to determine whether he or she is ready to lift boxes again.
If the employee has a back injury, it could be several weeks before they can return to work.
But, if the employer offered the worker an easy temporary job in the office, they may be able to return much sooner. To make something like this happen, a light-duty program must be put in place. A solid program should have the following features:
- Addresses environmental, physical, knowledge and emotional factors that may prevent employees from returning to work.
- Makes the transition to full-time work easier.
- Focuses on employees’ abilities instead of their disabilities.
Light-duty programs improve employee morale by increasing incentives for returning to work and staying safe. For the employer, they maintain productivity by lowering the number of lost work days.
These programs help speed up employees’ recovery processes. Recent research shows that 50% of workers who stay out of work for more than six months will never return to their jobs. If they stay out for more than one year, the likelihood of returning to work is about 10%.
Getting employees back to work as quickly as possible is the best way to bring about feelings of being part of the team. It also lessens the financial impact on the employee and their family.
The elements of a solid plan
To make sure a program is as comprehensive as possible, include the following elements:
- Performing meaningful tasks instead of simple busy work.
- Coordination with the doctor about work restrictions.
- Alternative work assignments that benefit the employer and employee.
- Descriptions of duties the injured employee must perform.
- Provisions for situations where employees may have to take additional medical leave time after returning to work.
- Stated conditions and time parameters for temporary assignments.
Benefits of return-to-work programs
- Making it easier to keep valuable employees, who are productive while recovering.
- Making communication happen between employees, employers and doctors, instead of between employees and their doctors.
- Making it difficult for employees to stay out of work longer than necessary.
- Reducing the need to recruit, hire and train new workers.
- Reducing the cost of workers’ comp disability payments to injured workers.
- Showing your concern for the injured employee’s health.
- Reducing claims costs, which can help reduce your rates.
The takeaway
Workers’ compensation consumes a sizable portion of overall personnel costs. A solid return program can reduce those costs, including intangible ones, like the absence of an experienced worker. Also, it is good for employee morale.
Newsom, Business Groups Agree on PAGA Reforms
California Governor Gavin Newsom, legislators and business groups have struck an agreement to reform a law that has become a costly thorn in the side of employers operating in the state, the Private Attorneys General Act.
The deal averts a showdown over a business-backed initiative slated to be on the November ballot that would repeal the law outright. The reform legislation seeks to keep the law intact while limiting frivolous litigation by allowing employers to make things right after a PAGA action has been filed.
PAGA allows workers who allege they have suffered labor violations, like unpaid overtime or being denied mandatory meal and rest breaks, to file suit against their employers rather than the more typical route of filing a claim with the state Department of Labor Standards Enforcement (DLSE).
The law essentially allows employees, represented by private attorneys, to stand in for the state and all their co-workers in suing their employer.
One reason workers pursue PAGA claims is the tremendous backlog that the DLSE faces, and they do so in the belief that the claim will be handled more quickly. However, a report by the Fix PAGA Coalition found that workers filing claims directly with the DLSE wait fewer than 10 months on average for their awards, compared to 23 months for PAGA court case awards.
PAGA settlements have exploded in recent years, jumping 100% between 2016 and 2022, according to a study by the California Chamber of Commerce.
Proceeds from settlements are split 25% with the employee who filed the case and the rest with the state, which collected more than $200 million in civil penalties during the 2022-2023 fiscal year.
The Fix PAGA Coalition’s report found that non-profits, small businesses and other employers have paid out nearly $10 billion in PAGA case awards since 2013, with attorneys receiving the far bigger portion of the settlements and employees consistently receiving only minimal payments.
Backers of the PAGA ballot initiative agreed to withdraw their measure if the legislation is passed and signed into law, which it was on July 1.
Highlights of the agreement
The governor’s announcement highlighted that the measure would:
Redefine ‘standing’ — It would require workers to personally experience the alleged violations brought in a claim.
Cure provisions – It would expand the list of Labor Code violations that can be cured before a PAGA action commences, which could allow employers to avoid lawsuits by making employees whole after receiving notice of alleged violations.
Limiting claims – It would codify a court’s ability to limit the scope of claims presented at trial to better manage the complaint.
Reforms penalty structure — It would cap penalties on employers that quickly fix policies and/or practices to make workers whole after they receive a notice of a PAGA action. It also caps penalties on employers that proactively comply with the Labor Code before receiving a PAGA notice.
Workers larger share of awards – It would increase the portion of awards allocated to employees to 35% from 25%.
Newsom agreed to pursue a trailer bill to provide funding for the Labor Department to expedite hiring and filling vacancies.
The takeaway
Jennifer Barrera, CEO of the California Chamber of Commerce, said in a prepared statement: “This package provides meaningful reforms that ensure workers continue to have a strong vehicle to get labor claims resolved, while also limiting the frivolous litigation that has cost employers billions without benefiting workers.”
Legislators will have to move quickly to pass the measure into law by the June 27 deadline. While the legislation will not eliminate PAGA, all sides of the agreement predict it would go a long way towards reducing frivolous claims.
Changes Coming to Electronics, Dual-Wage Class Codes
California Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara on May 31 approved all of the Workers’ Compensation Insurance Rating Bureau’s recommended changes to class codes for some electronics manufacturing sectors, as well as increases to the wage thresholds for construction industry dual classifications.
The following changes will take effect for policies incepting on or after Sept. 1, 2024:
Electronics manufacturing industry
One of the changes links two more classes to the 8874 companion classification, which was created in September 2022 to cover certain low-risk classes in the electronics industry group.
Currently, 8874 is a companion class that covers payroll for lower-risk jobs in hardware and software design and development, computer-aided design, clerical and outside sales operations for two electronics industry classes:
- 3681 (manufacturing operations for electronic instruments, computer peripherals, telecommunications equipment), and
- 4112 (integrated circuit and semiconductor wafer manufacturing).
Starting Sept. 1, similar low-risk white-collar personnel currently assigned to class 3572 (medical instrument manufacturing) and 3682 (non-electric instrument manufacturing) will be linked to the 8874 companion class code.
Dual-wage increases
The thresholds that separate high- and low-wage earners in 16 dual-wage construction classes are also increasing Sept. 1.
These class codes have vastly different pure premium rates for workers above and below a certain threshold as the lower-wage workers (often who are less experienced) have historically filed more workers’ comp claims. Rates for lower-wage workers are often double the rates for higher-wage workers.
The following illustrates the changes:
Classification | Current threshold | Threshold starting 9/1 |
5207/5028 Masonry | $32 | $35 |
5190/5140 Electrical Wiring | $34 | $36 |
5183/5187 Plumbing | $31 | $32 |
5185/5186 Automatic Sprinkler Installation | $32 | $33 |
5201/5205 Concrete or Cement Work | $32 | $33 |
5403/5432 Carpentry | $39 | $41 |
5446/5447 Wallboard Installation | $38 | $41 |
5467/5470 Glaziers | $36 | $39 |
5474/5482 Painting/ Waterproofing | $31 | $32 |
5484/5485 Plastering or Stucco Work | $36 | $38 |
5538/5542 Sheet Metal Work | $29 | $33 |
5552/5553 Roofing | $29 | $31 |
5632/5633 Steel Framing | $39 | $41 |
6218/6220 Excavation/Grading/Land Leveling | $38 | $40 |
6307/6308 Sewer Construction | $38 | $40 |
6315/6316 Water/Gas Mains | $38 | $40 |
Common Mistakes with Builder’s Risk Coinsurance Clauses
Coinsurance clauses are commonly found in a builder’s risk completed value policy.
A coinsurance clause involves the policyholder becoming a co-insurer of the risk of loss with the insurer. In other words, certain conditions would result in the insurance company not paying the total amount of loss, thereby leaving the policyholder to bear the remainder. The insured and the insurer jointly assume the risk.
The benefit of buying an insurance policy with such a clause is that the policyholder will usually have relatively low premiums compared to other similar policies that don’t contain a coinsurance clause.
That said, anyone considering a coinsurance clause should understand what it entails and requires, so that they aren’t taken by surprise with penalties if a loss should occur.
A typical coinsurance clause found in a builder’s risk completed value policy will say that the insurer will not pay more for any loss than the proportion that the limit of insurance bears to the value of the structure described in the declarations as of the structure’s date of completion.
How it works
The way a coinsurance clause works with the policy limit is often a source of confusion for policyholders.
Take a loss of $20,000 with a policy limit of $100,000, for instance. It would superficially appear as though the insurer would be responsible for the total loss.
But, once the coinsurance clause is figured into the equation, the insurer might not be responsible for paying the total loss amount. This will depend on the policyholder maintaining enough insurance to avoid the coinsurance penalty.
If the coinsurance is applied, it might look something like this:
Still using the $100,000 policy and $20,000 worth of damage from above, the completed value of the project will be determined as $120,000 at the time of loss. The value of the $100,000 policy is only 80% of the $120,000 actual value of the project. So, the insurer is only responsible to pay $16,000, which is 80% of the $20,000 worth of damage.
Anytime the policyholder receives a lesser sum than what the full value of the claim is because of a shortfall between the completed value of the project and the policy limit, it’s termed a coinsurance penalty. The discrepancy between the two numbers can be the result of a number of mistakes made by the policyholder.
Common errors
Policyholders often make the mistake of failing to report when expected costs are surpassed. Any increased completed value must be shown in the policy limit when costs overrun original figures. The best way to make sure the policy limit is updated is by keeping your insurance agent apprised to the overruns so that the appropriate changes can be made.
All too often a policyholder makes the mistake of setting their limit of insurance based on the amount of the construction loan for the structure.
Most of the time, the completed value of the project is greater than the amount of the construction loan. An example would be a significant portion of a building project being funded by cash, but not computing the cash amount when totaling the completed value. If the insurance is only for the financed amount, then the policyholder will suffer a coinsurance penalty for any losses.
Another common mistake occurs when the policyholder doesn’t include profit and overhead in the completed value. These are generally figured at 10% for each. If not accounted for, this can cause a substantial coinsurance penalty.
Sometimes, it’s what shouldn’t be included that may lead to problems. Land value, excavations, and underground work, for example, shouldn’t be included in the completed value. These aren’t covered losses on typical policy forms. So, the policyholder would just be paying additional costs for items that wouldn’t be covered during loss.
New Rule Permits Non-Employees to Join OSHA Inspections
A new Department of Labor rule change clarifies the rights of employees to appoint an outside representative to accompany OSHA officers during workplace inspections.
OSHA inspections usually occur after a workplace has had a safety-related incident or a whistleblower has reported suspected safety violations. Attorneys representing employers say the new rule, which comes into force May 31, could be problematic for businesses trying to keep inspections free of disruptions.
Advocates for employers worry that external observers may use their new ability to collect information that can be used to convince employees to join a union.
They also see a potential for other adversaries to join the inspections in search of employer failures. These might include disgruntled former employees, plaintiffs’ attorneys, potential expert witnesses or injured workers’ family members.
OSHA stressed that the final decision as to whether to permit a third party representative to join the inspection is up to the OSHA compliance safety and health officer that conducts the inspection. Either the employer or workers may appeal to the CSHO to reject a representative, but the CSHO decides.
In its response to public comments, OSHA emphasized the importance of employee representation to gathering necessary information about worksite conditions and hazards.
It also noted that the rule does not limit third party representatives to union representatives; third parties’ ability to participate will be based on their knowledge, skills or experience.
“Third party representatives’ sole purpose onsite is to aid OSHA’s inspection,” it wrote, “and CSHOs have authority to deny the right of accompaniment to third parties who do not do that or who interfere with a fair and orderly inspection.”
Supporters of the rule argued that third parties may:
- Have important technical or subject matter expertise.
- Have language skills and cultural knowledge.
- Increase employees’ trust in the inspections.
- Improve inspections of multi-employer worksites such as construction sites.
- Balance the rights of employers and employees.
The takeaway
Employers may be more likely to face litigation and a difficult discovery process after an accident when the revised walkaround rule comes into force this month, legal pundits say.
Some observers recommend that employers stand ready to object to participation from plaintiffs’ attorneys who may not have much workplace safety expertise but who know how to fish for clients. It will be important that they evaluate the need for a particular third party to participate in the inspection.
The rule might not take effect on schedule. Court challenges from the groups who have opposed it are anticipated. A court might issue an injunction preventing the rule’s enforcement during litigation.
That is uncertain, however, so employers should be ready on May 31 to permit third parties to join OSHA inspectors on their premises if workers request it.
Protect Yourself against Liability Exposure from Subcontractors’ Employees
As a business owner, you could be held liable for the actions of other peoples’ employees.
U.S. employment law has long recognized that workers may have an employment relationship with multiple entities at the same time. That means your company could get stung with OSHA fines, Title VII discrimination claims and other actions that arise from the actions of an employee that you thought was a subcontractor.
Here’s why:
In Secretary of Labor vs. Summit Contractors, the 8th Circuit ruled that companies that exercise overall control of a job site can be held liable for workplace infractions – even when the individual or individuals directly responsible for the infraction were employees of another firm, and no employees of the controlling employer were directly involved.
Furthermore, even if your company doesn’t exercise direct supervisory control of subcontractors, courts have held that a de facto employment situation exists if the controlling employer simply reserves the right to exercise control.
Protecting yourself
Here are some ways to safeguard yourself from joint employer liability:
- Ensure that all subcontractors have employee liability insurance and general liability insurance of their own.
- Check out the vendor or subcontractor’s track record with safety and OSHA-related claims.
- Research the subcontractor’s bonding history.
- Ensure your employer’s liability insurance covers claims that may arise from contractors and vendors working on your property, or on worksites your company controls.
- Negotiate for an indemnification clause in any vendor contracts or subcontracting arrangements.
- Don’t rely on verbal assurances: Put the subcontractor’s responsibility for complying with OSHA standards and labor laws, rules and regulations in writing, as part of the contract.
- Hold regular safety meetings with representatives from the subcontractor’s firm, and document them.
- Don’t sign a contract with a manpower or employee leasing firm unless you have looked through it for exposure to liability from their employees.
- Ensure the vendor or subcontractor is providing job site supervision. At a minimum, ensure their management is checking on the site regularly. If all supervision is left to you, federal regulators may deem these workers to be your employees.
- Don’t discipline the subcontractor’s workers directly. Work through the subcontracting entity wherever possible. If your supervisors attempt to discipline their employees, or direct their work too closely, courts may find that a de facto employment relationship exists with your firm as well as with the subcontractor. This exposes you to liabilities that these employees may cause.
- Train your middle managers and foremen that they should not attempt to take on the role of supervisor to subcontractors’ employees and onsite vendors.
- Don’t lend heavy equipment, power tools or vehicles to subcontractors on the job site, unless you also send a designated operator. Contractors are expected to have and maintain their own equipment. Also, when you send your own operator with a forklift, for example, you can help ensure that the subcontractor doesn’t expose you to liability because of an accident caused by an unqualified operator.
For more information, or to schedule an insurance and risk exposure review, call us today.
Training Your Drivers to Avoid Road Debris
Road debris is a common problem on America’s roadways. Most accidents caused by debris are sudden and unanticipated and can result in serious injury or death.
Road debris is anything that doesn’t belong on the road, including trash, stuff that may have fallen from other trucks, branches and other natural objects that fall or blow onto the road. After big storms debris can often be found littering the roads.
This hazard contributed to more than 200,000 accidents that injured more than 39,000 people and killed 500 over a three-year period, according to the AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety. The majority of these accidents occurred on interstate and state highways.
Two-thirds of all road-debris accidents are the result of objects falling off moving vehicles.
According to the foundation, 37% of all fatal road-debris accidents involved a driver suddenly swerving to try and avoid debris. Here are some of the types of personal injury crashes that can occur when debris is on a roadway:
- Single or multiple vehicle sideswipe collisions from swerving when attempting to avoid debris.
- High-impact, rear-end collisions when a vehicle suddenly brakes to avoid debris.
- Rollovers caused by hitting debris.
- Head-on crashes from swerving to avoid debris.
The most dangerous form of road debris is that which falls off another vehicle, forcing other motorists to take quick evasive action, which can cause them to swerve or forcefully apply their brakes. However, when a driver has to suddenly react to avoid an object, they also run the risk of hitting a guard rail or another vehicle.
Train drivers
It’s important that firms with driving employees include training about the dangers of road debris and how to reduce the chances of causing an accident when encountering it.
- Drivers should stay alert at all times.
- They should keep a comfortable distance between themselves and the vehicle in front of them by following the three-second rule. This will provide enough time for a driver to take evasive action, if needed.
- If the driver is behind a vehicle hauling goods of any type, they should add another second or two to the count. Even better: They should change lanes.
- If they spy a truck with an unsecured load, they should avoid driving behind it, change lanes and pass when it’s safe to do so. This way, if something falls off, the driver doesn’t have to take evasive action.
- If a driver sees debris in the distance in their lane, they should simply change lanes calmly if there is plenty of space in an adjacent lane. If there is a car behind them, it’s courteous to flash the brake lights twice to let them know you’re dodging on purpose and give them a few extra seconds to follow suit.
If there is only one lane, no shoulder or the driver is boxed in, they should not change lanes. In these cases, they should use their best judgment and try to minimize damage to the vehicle. This may include slowing down significantly and possibly trying to adjust their lane position so that their tires don’t run over the debris. This gives them the best chance to maintain control of their vehicle, although there may be some damage to the front of the vehicle and/or the undercarriage.
Liability and insurance
It’s difficult to establish liability in road-debris accidents.
It’s a bit easier if it arises from debris suddenly flying from a truck and striking another vehicle. If the load is unsecured, the driver of that vehicle could be held at fault. If the other driver doesn’t stick around, you may be able to file a claim under your uninsured motorist coverage.
However, in cases where your driver hits debris that was laying on the roadway, your insurer may determine that your driver failed to avoid the debris because they were either distracted or speeding, and deny coverage as a result.